Yggdrasill - World tree -

Japan was continuously damaged. by the [act of aggression] and [distorted history], from S.Korea. I seek the truth, while tracking the anti-Japan of liar, expose the history distortion by anti-Japan. The South Korean government hides the truth of history. Korean school educates the history of the imitation. The Korean who criticized the imitation history by Korea was punished for a law of Korea. Therefore, Korea is a country with a great many falsehood and false evidence. Everyone, please do not be fooled into whether South Korea. Japanese language article: http://blog.livedoor.jp/yngvi_frey/  Yngvi Frey

Takeshima

Territorial Disputes Involving Japan. Cause of dispute about the Takeshima = [Terrorism/lie/Delusion by South Korea.] Actually, "Dokdo is Korean land" are fiction story fabricated by the ROK. Takeshima(Liancourt Rocks) is Japan territory on actual facts

Japan is respect the historical truth.
Japan to respect the rules.

S-Korea(South Korea) full of falsehoods tends to carry out history distortion violently, tends to force “East Sea”, and tends to erase the name of the “Sea of Japan”.
dokdo name's a criminal symbol. Takeshima(Liancourt Rocks) is a territory of Japan. Korean gov conceals the history, and deceiving all.

In Takeshima's position, "name of Dokdo" does not exist in an old map.(although South Koreans are doing forgery and perjury desperately).


Takeshima(Liancourt Rocks) in which S-Korea carries out illegal occupation is not Dokdo which Korea required. Differ in a position.
"Korean Geography" in 1889, Old Korea said the location of Dokdo(Old Usando) "areas of the Daehan Empire - 42'25N-33'15N, 130'35E-124'30E".

But, Liancourt Rocks(Takeshima) is 37'14N, 131'52E.

Place dokdo. All Korean maps show "Usando(old name of Dokdo which Korean say)" is 2km from Ulleungdo. but "Liancourt Rocks(Takeshima)" is 92km away.

Takeshima(Liancourt Rocks) at a place distant from "S-Korean territory Dokdo(Usando)." But, During discussions about the San Francisco Peace Treaty... S-Korea began to insist "Takeshima = Dokdo on S-Korea", and carried out the return request.
In addition to this, S-Korea, demanded return of the "fictitious island(波浪島/Parangdo or Ieodo)" which doesn't exist on the earth. "Usando(dokdo)"&"fictitious island." Naturally, since S-Korea didn't have proof, these were excepted in the Treaty of San Francisco.
Dokdo(Usando) & fictitious island. Naturally, since S-Korea didn't have proof, these were excepted in the Treaty of San Francisco.

《Rusk note of 1951 (ラスク書簡)》 Official document text 公文書原文
http://blog.livedoor.jp/yngvi_frey-eng/archives/4823291.html
Rusk note of 1951 Official document, is The reply by the American government to a request in the San Francisco Peace Treaty draft of South Korea as of August 10, 1951.
"South Korea is continuing illegal occupation Takeshima(Liancourt Rocks) of Japan." American Ambassador Douglas MacArthur II sent Official telegram, in April 1960.
http://blog.livedoor.jp/yngvi_frey-eng/archives/17590394.html
Also in 1960, the USA has made the advice to South Korea.


Takeshima(Liancourt Rocks) hasn't been a S-Korean territory from ancient times. Claim of "Dokdo & East Sea" is aggression act of S-Korea. Dokdo Advocacy is proof of terrorist.


September 29, 1904. The sea lion fishery petition by Liancourt Rocks.

Dokdo-or-Takeshima?: 1904 Sep 29 - Nakai Yozaburo (中井養三) Petition to Incorporate Ryanko-to (Liancourt Rocks)
http://dokdo-or-takeshima.blogspot.jp/2007/06/petition-to-incorporate-ryanko-to.html

History - Takeshima / Seokdo in Imperial Edict 41 is not "Dokdo". http://youtu.be/-iB0G5D-MOw

Territorial Problems (1): Takeshima | Le vrai Japon. History of Takeshima
http://www.nippon.fr/archives/3713


Takeshima(Liancourt Rocks) illegal occupation, is terrorism of S-Korea which carried out unjust invasion, and slaughter of Japanese people by S-Korea, it cruel criminal act of S-Korea which disregarded international rules.

Truth of dokdo = Dokdo name is symbol of S-Korean crime. Fact truth is Japanese territory "Takeshima". S-Korea of the terrorist nation is overflowing with lie. S-Korea ignores truth and fact.
http://p.twipple.jp/sLw0U This island isn't Korean land. Historically and international law are also Takeshima(Liancourt Rocks) of a Japanese territory.


 ■From A.D. 1952 to 1965. Crime of South Korea.
S-Korea is a international-rules disregard.
Terrorism(dokdo) from S-Korea to Japan, is crime of Felony offenses(李承晩) which performed Korean massacre. http://bit.ly/JsM48q

※Korea's enforcement of illegal Syngman Rhee Line and Takeshima(Liancourt Rocks) illegal occupation.

●Syngman Rhee(李承晩)
Syngman Rhee is the downfall Yangban(両班) lineage.
The S-Korea representative of the U.S. occupation time after the Japanese army withdrawal by Japanese defeat. Felonious offenses which repeated the massacre in S-Korea.
李承晩李承晩
李承晩李承晩
S-Korea has succeed to the heart of barbarous Yangban more than N-Korea.
The Japan's Annexation of Korea age, Syngman Rhee lived in the U.S., And although he returned temporarily to Korea, it returns to the U.S. immediately. Syngman Rhee returns to Korea after Japanese defeat, and becomes a representative of S-Korea under the U.S. occupation. (N-Korea is Kim Il-sung(金日成) under the Soviet Union occupation).

After Syngman Rhee repeated the massacre in S-Korea(http://bit.ly/JsM48q), his atrocity spread abroad to Japan.

Annals of crime of dokdo.
S-Korea which disregarded the international provision. Syngman Rhee Line(李承晩ライン) enacted unilaterally, the Japan area has been infringed.
Until abolished "Illegal Syngman Rhee Line". -- Japanese 3929 people were detained and became hostage(The hostage's Japanese people was confined in South Korea for about ten years or more), and 44 people slaughtered. Moreover, 328 Japanese ships were seized unfairly. Japanese 44 persons, Execution by gun shooting or die by drowning.

The international terrorist offense of Syngman Rhee who slaughtered Japanese people.
Syngman Rhee who repeated the slaughter did, the plan of the Japanese slaughter trick further after that.(A.D.1960). Finally Syngman Rhee's slaughter plan ends in A.D.1960 in failure. And he fled to Hawaii.

S-Korea should stop "fact distortion / Perjury" and "History forgery", and "Territory infringement".
In fact, Liancourt Rocks(Takeshima) isn't Korean Island. Dokdo name propulsion is proof of terrorist, and Dokdo advocacy is supporter of terrorism.

International terrorism nation S-Korea disregarded international rules, and has changed the name of a Japanese“Takeshima(Liancourt Rocks)”with“Dokdo”without permission.
Similarly, S-Korea of international terrorism nation has been continue to ignore the world history. And S-Korea tends to carry out history distortion violently, tends to force “East Sea”, and tends to erase the name of the “Sea of Japan”.


Japan's Inalterable Position on the Sovereignty of Takeshima(Liancourt Rocks).
1.In the light of historical facts and based upon international law, it is apparent that Takeshima(Liancourt Rocks) is an inherent part of the territory of Japan.
2.The occupation of Takeshima(Liancourt Rocks) by the Republic of Korea is an illegal occupation undertaken on absolutely no basis in international law. Any measures taken with regard to Takeshima(Liancourt Rocks) by the Republic of Korea based on such an illegal occupation have no legal justification.
(Note: The Republic of Korea has yet to demonstrate a clear basis for its claims that, prior to Japan's effective control over Takeshima(Liancourt Rocks) and establishment of sovereignty, the Republic of Korea had previously demonstrated effective control over Takeshima.)

http://kimigayo-japan.seesaa.net/article/156750273.html


Takeshima is Japanese territory

続きを読む

"South Korea is continuing illegal occupation Takeshima of Japan." American Ambassador Douglas MacArthur II sent Official telegram, in April 1960.

The Liancourt Rocks is the Takeshima of Japan. This island is not a Dokdo of "Korea claim".
Takeshima is Japanese territory. Is not a South Korean island.


On 27th April, 1960, American Ambassador Douglas MacArthur II sent telegram to J. Graham Parsons, Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, in Washington, and in it, he says that “Therefore we should also press new ROK regime to return Takeshima to Japan.” We already knew that U.S. warned ROK that Takeshima is Japanese island in both 1951 and 1952.


SECSTATE 3470 PRIORITY

Rptd info:
Amembassy SEOUL 351

Reported information :

For Assistant Secretary Parsons from MacArthur.
Seoul for Ambassador McConaughy.


Now that we have prospect of new and democratic regime in Korea I strongly recommend that as soon as possible we seize opportunity to try to bring about durable solution to Korea - Japan dispute.
As long as Rhee held power there seemed little chance of any solution but now we have entirely new situation which could lead to liquidation of Korea - Japan controversy. Implications of Korea-Japan are not just bilateral between government of Japan and Korea but deeply and directly involve US and our inescapable responsibilities in Northeast Asia.

As practical matter if reasonable solution is to be found it will be produced only by our good offices and working closely with both Korea and Government of Japan. It is of utmost importance that we identify and be prepared to move swiftly for solution those specific Korea-government of Japan problems which prevent progress toward basic settlement this festering dispute. We do not know what response Communists may make to new Korea regime and it is vital we try to put Korea-Government of Japan house in order as soon as possible.

While Rhee regime violated most basic tenets of democracy in authoritarian police rule imposed on Korean people, it has also in past done violence to most fundamental principles of international conduct and morality by committing acts of piracy on high seas around Rhee Line and then imprisoning and holding as political hostage Japanese fishermen and by seizing and holding non-Korean territory by force.

The uncivilized practice of hostage diplomacy is one of our serious charge against Communist China and if continued by Korea it will be a great liability to a new democratic Korea regime.

I therefore recommend strongly that as soon as new regime is in control in Korea (whether or not it be of interim character) we use all our influence to persuade it (1) to release and return to Japan all repeat all Japanese fishermen hostage (including those who have not completed their sentences) who have suffered so cruelly from Rhee's uncivilized and oppressive acts and (2) to cease practice of seizing Japanese fishing vessels on high seas. This would not only rid new Korea regime of liability of practicing hostage diplomacy but also more than anything else would lay foundation in Japan for really fruitful negotiations.
At same time I would be prepared to press Kishi and government of Japan most strongly that in return for repatriation of all fishermen, Japanese would exercise self-restraint in their fishing operations in Korean Straits until reasonable opportunity had been given for negotiation of mutually agreed Korea - Japan fishing conservation agreement.

In addition to seizing Japanese boats in high seas and practicing hostage diplomacy, Rhee regime also seized by force and is holding illegally Takeshima Island which as always been considered as Japanese territory.
This is very serious and permanent irritant in Japan-Korea relations and there can be no over-all Korea-Japan settlement until this island is returned to Japan. Therefore we should also press new Korea regime to return Takeshima to Japan.

If it is unwilling to do so pending satisfactory conclusion of over-call Korea-Japan negotiations, new regime should at least signify a willingness to withdraw from as part of mutually satisfactory settlement of other outstanding issues between two countries.

While we should press strongly for return of Takeshima to Japan, if by any chance new regime were unwilling to do so we should, as very minimum, insist that they agree to submit matter to International Court of Justice(ICJ) for arbitration.

Finally, we should inform new regime very clearly that it must be prepared to adjust its relations with Japan on terms of reciprocity, in such matters as diplomatic missions, visits by businessmen and journalists, commercial trade. Japanese have suffered Rhee's occupation-minded approach for eight years and will be unwilling to accept such indefensible treatment from his successor.
In its own interests, new regime should start with conformity with normal International standards of conduct, and could most usefully begin (in terms of Japanese and other free world opinion) by permitting Japanese diplomatic mission to enter and function in Korea on same terms Korea Embassy operates here.

If we now move swiftly with new Korea regime which should generally be receptive to our views because of our helpfulness, we may have initial opportunity, which may never reoccur, to influence its position on Japan-Korea problem. Japanese would certainly welcome warmly and reciprocate fully, measures indicating new Korea regime willing take "new look" at Japan.


D MacAuthur:mek POL:WHGleysteem DCMWmLeonhart



 Text: by Photo of classification Official file.
Original documents are from Photo http://www.nikaidou.com/archives/28275

Douglas MacArthur II is a nephew of General MacArthur and an American diplomat. He served as U.S. ambassador to Japan from 1957 to 1961.

 Reference:

■http://texas-daddy.com/DouglasMacArthur-Telegram.pdf
■http://dokdo-or-takeshima.blogspot.jp/2012/08/1960-apr27-american-ambassador-says.html


 U.S. official documents pertaining to "Takeshima in Japan".
■《Rusk note of 1951 (ラスク書簡)》 Official document text 公文書原文
http://blog.livedoor.jp/yngvi_frey-eng/archives/4823291.html

Even now, Korea is still the international terrorism nation.

 Japanese translation of the original:
【韓国による竹島不法占拠問題】1951年-ラスク書簡の公文書原文和訳&1960年-ダグラス・マッカーサー2世米国大使の公電原文和訳【韓国は数十年、テロ行為を続けている国】
http://blog.livedoor.jp/yngvi_frey/archives/5916734.html

《Rusk note of 1951 (ラスク書簡)》 Official document text 公文書原文

《Rusk note of 1951 (ラスク書簡)》
Rusk note of August 10, 1951
by Dean Rusk


His Excellency

Dr. You Chan Yang,

Ambassador of Korea.


Excellency:

I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your notes of July 19 and August 2, 1951 presenting certain requests for the consideration of the Government of the United States with regard to thedraft treaty of peace with Japan.

With respect torequest of the Korean Governmentthat Article 2(a) of the draft be revised to provide that Japan "confirms that it renounced on August 9, 1945, all right, title and claim to Korea and the islands which were part of Korea prior to its annexation by Japan, including the islands Quelpart, Port Hamilton, Dagelet, Dokdo and Parangdo," the United States Government regrets that it is unable to concur in this proposed amendment. The United States Government does not feel that the Treaty should adopt the theory that Japan's acceptance of thePotsdam Declarationon August 9, 1945 constituted a formalor final renunciation of sovereignty by Japan over the areas dealt with in the Declaration. As regards the island of Dokdo, otherwise known as Takeshima orLiancourt Rocks, this normally uninhabited rock formation was according to our information never treated as part of Korea and, since about 1905, has been under the jurisdiction of the Oki Islands Branch Office of Shimane Prefe
cture of Japan. The island does not appear ever before to have been claimed by Korea. It is understood that the Korean Government's request that "Parangdo" be included among the islands named in the treaty as having been renounced by Japan has been withdrawn.

The United States Government agrees that the terms of paragraph (a) of Article 4 of the draft treaty are subject to misunderstanding and accordingly proposes, in order to meet the view of the Korean Government, to insert at the beginning of paragraph (a) the phrase, "Subject to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this Article", and then to add a new paragraph (b) reading as follows:


(b) "Japan recongnizes the validity of dispositions of property of Japan and Japanese nationals made by or pursuant to directives of United States Military Government in any ofthe areas referred to in Articles 2 and 3".


The present paragraph (b) of Article 4 becomes paragraph(c).

The Government of the United States regrets that it is unable to accept the Korean Government's amendment to Article 9 of the draft treaty. In view of the many national interests involved, any attempt to include in the treaty provisions governing fishing in high seas areas would indefinitely delay the treaty's conclusion. It is desired to point out, however, that the so-called MacArthur line will stand until the treaty comes into force, and that Korea, which obtains the benefits of Article 9, will have the opportunity of negotiating a fishing agreement with Japan prior to that date.

With respect to the Korean Government's desire to obtain the benefits of Article 15(a) of the treaty, there would seem to be no necessity to oblige Japan to return the property of persons in Japan of Korean origin since such property was not sequestered or otherwise interfered with by the Japanese Government during the war. In view of the fact that such persons had the status ofJapanese nationals it would not seem appropriate that they obtain compensation for damage to their property as a result of the war.

Accept, Excellency, the renewed assurances of my highest consideration.

For the Secretary of State:

Dean Rusk



This work is in thepublic domainin the United States because it is awork of the United Statesfederalgovernment(see17 U.S.C. 105).

Japanese translation:
http://ja.wikisource.org/wiki/%E3%83%A9%E3%82%B9%E3%82%AF%E6%9B%B8%E7%B0%A1
http://blog.livedoor.jp/yngvi_frey/archives/5916734.html

Offer: Wikisource
Rusk note of 1951 (ラスク書簡)
Author: American former Assistant Secretary of State Dean rusk.
Source:
The official document of inclusion to RG59 of the U.S. National Archives (NARA), Lot54 D423 JAPANESE PEACE TREATY FILES OF JOHN FOSTER DULLES, Box 8, and Korea.
The reply by the American government to a request in the San Francisco Peace Treaty draft of South Korea as of August 10, 1951.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/14/Rusk1.jpg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6e/Rusk2.jpg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5f/Rusk3.jpg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c6/Rusk4.jpg



最新記事
livedoor プロフィール
QRコード
QRコード
  • ライブドアブログ